Compare

Network Access Control (NAC)

Monitoring your network environment costs time and money – we help you find the right provider
We help you to get the most out of your security budget and resources

The Best Solution For Your Security

Zero trust architectures emerged as a concept more than 10 years ago and are now even defined in cybersecurity standards. Solutions for implementing this concept are marketed as Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA). The predecessors of these products are known as Network Access Control (NAC). NACs are used to grant fine-grained access rights to locally hosted infrastructure.

Basically, both product categories are about identifying devices and automatically enforcing security policies to ensure that only authorized users can access the resources they need at a given time via secure endpoints. Often, a NAC is a cost-effective and pragmatic first step to increase the security level of the infrastructure.

Our provider directory - are you already part of it?

Our customers can receive offers from the following providers - and all others

Our Service for you

Simple. Clear. Affordable.

CyberCompare, A Bosch Business is the independent purchasing platform for Cybersecurity and your partner for the procurement of IT, OT and IoT security.
We will help you find the right provider in 4 steps and will be happy to advise you:

1. Requirements

We help you to specify your requirements

2. Tendering

CyberCompare tenders your requirements anonymously

3. Comparison

We provide you with an objective comparison of provider offerings

4. Final Decision

You make the last decision with our support

What our customers have to say about us

It's the Result That Counts

benefit from our knowledge and experience

Good to Know

NAC is not synonymous with ZTNA

Modern NAC systems fulfill many of the requirements for a zero-trust architecture (ZTNA) when implemented across the board. However, other Zero Trust requirements cannot easily be covered with it. The boundaries are becoming increasingly blurred as many NAC providers are constantly developing their solutions in the direction of ZTNA and marketing them accordingly. Providers of NAC and ZTNA solutions are naturally to be found among the manufacturers of infrastructure components such as firewalls and content delivery networks (CDN). In addition, however, there are now many smaller and larger companies, some of which have very good offerings and numerous references.

Comparing is important

For those interested in “Secure (Access) Service Edge”, “Network/Asset Access Control” or “Zero Trust Network Access Control” solutions, the first question is how to prioritize them in comparison to other security measures. Often, other measures are easier or less expensive to implement and reduce the risk of damage from cyber-attacks to a similar extent. The target architecture must then be clarified. And finally, a structured comparison of offers based on content and commercial criteria allows a good price/performance ratio. CyberCompare helps with all these steps to make security more affordable and easier for the clientele.

We keep you up-to-date with our whitepapers

Our Whitepaper

ZTNA & NAC

ZTNA & NAC – Tips & tricks for requirement and procurement

Both ZTNA and NAC are about identifying devices and enforcing security policies automatically to ensure that only authorized users can access the resources they need at a given time via secure endpoints. But what tips & tricks are needed for requirements definition and procurement? We highlight various aspects in our whitepaper. Download now and get important tips & tricks.
Book an appointment to get a free offer comparison, specifically for your case.

Simeon Mussler
COO of CyberCompare

+49 (0)711 811-91494
  cybercompare@de.bosch.com

CyberCompare Logo

Protect, Detect, Respond

04. June 2024 | 09:00 - 11:15 AM

Gain insights from security providers on awareness, phishing and co.